安樂死辯論英文
安樂死是醫學界最有爭議的問題之一，那麼如何用英文辯論安樂死呢?今天小編給大家分享一篇安樂死辯論資料的英文稿，希望對大家有所幫助。
正方觀點：
1.If a person loses the survivability of the community has not contributed to lose the meaning of life.reduce reliance on others and a burden on society.
如果一個人失去了生存能力，對社會沒有了貢獻，也就失去了生命的意義，減少對別人的倚賴和對社會的負擔。
2.the complete elimination of euthanasia patients can be painful diseases， mental stress and depression thinking exists.
安樂死可以徹底消除病人的疾病痛苦，精神壓力和思想懮愁
3.a person bound to die sooner or later die; One hundred dead， the living dead are free， patients and relatives reflex happy
人總難免一死，早晚都是死;一死百了，死人活人都解脫，患者與親朋皆大歡
4.the lives of their own people， individuals have the right to end their lives， which is opposed to the human rights and personal freedom.
人的生命屬於自己，個人有權結束生命，這是個人自由和獨享的人權
5.we believe that euthanasia is a form of respect for life.
安樂死是尊重生命的一種方式。
6. 首先，從主觀方面來講，安樂死對於病人自身，是一種減少生命痛苦的方式。人，總是趨利避害的，沒有人會說“我要去尋找痛苦，我要去遠離快樂”。當一個人處於精神和軀體的極端痛苦之下，當生命的存在已成為一場噩夢，我們難道還要 提及道德和倫理嗎?生存這個基本的“長度”都已經不能夠維持，還要來談及生命的寬度，還要去顧及倫理的重量嗎?
First，from a subjective point of view.Euthanasia for the patients themselves， is a way to reduce human suffering.People always seek
advantages and avoid disadvantages， and no one would say， "I am going to look
painful， I had to go far from happy."When a person is
under extreme suffering in the body and the spirit， when the very existence of life has become a nightmare.Should we mention the
moral and ethical?The basic survival of the "length" are not able to maintain， but also to talk about the breadth of life，we still
have to take into account the weight of ethics?
7.We feel this suffering， we have come with this then you have no choice in the circumstances， we have chosen euthanasia.This is not contempt for life， nor is it moral decline.Instead， it was a time in the lives of torment and suffering to the loved ones around us to the people we love.more acceptable alternative to the road.Therefore， we believe that euthanasia is a form of respect for life.
我們感受著這種痛苦，我們體會著這個中滋味，在無法選擇的情況下，我們選擇了安樂死。這不是對生命的藐視，也不是道德的淪喪。反而，這是一種
在生命面臨煎熬和磨難的時候，為我們身邊的親人，為我們愛著的人，選擇另一條更容易接受的道路。因此，我方認為，安樂死是尊重生命的一種方式.
反方觀點：
1. Euthanasia is a rejection of the importance and value of human life
安樂死是拒絕了人類生活的意義和價值
2，"euthanasia" if legal form confirm down， may be some people use to depriving the life of others. In addition， to the understanding of the disease in humans is still very limited circumstances， without legal license and others end life， contrary to the right to live moral principles.
“安樂死”如果以法律形式確認下來，可能會被一些人利用，用以非法剝奪他人的生命。另外，在人類對疾病的認識還十分有限的情況下，未經法律許可而結束他人生命，有悖於生存權利的道德準則。
3.Oppose euthanasia people have argued that the euthanasia is a violation of the laws of nature and death against natural behavior， weaken the human overcome the disaster of the strength and courage.
反對安樂死合法化的人士則認為，安樂死是違反生老病死自然規律的反自然行為，削弱了人類戰勝災難的力量和勇氣。
4.Euthanasia is disguised violations of the right to life
安樂死是變相侵害生命權。