保護動物高中英語作文精選

　　地球上沒有動物，那是一個沒有活力的世界。下面，是小編為你整理的，希望對你有幫助!

　　篇1

　　Animals are natural resources that people have wasted all through our history. Animals have been killed for their fur and feathers, for food, for sport, and simply because they were in the way. Thousands of kinds of animals have disappeared from the earth forever. Hundreds more are on the danger list today. About 170 kinds in the United States alone are considered in danger.

　　Why should people care? Because we need animals, and because once they are gone, there will never be any more. Animals are more than just beautiful or interesting. They are more than just a source of food. Every animal has its place in the balance of nature. Destroying one kind of animal can create many problems. For example, when farmers killed large numbers of hawks, the farmers' stores of corn and grain were destroyed by rats and mice. Why? Because hawks eat rats and mice, with no hawks to keep down their numbers, the rats and mice multiplied quickly.

　　Luckily, some people are working to help save the animals. Some groups raise money to let people know about the problem. And they try to get the governments to pass laws protecting animals in danger. Quite a few countries have passed laws. These laws forbid the killing of any animal or planton the danger list. Slowly, the number of some animals in danger is growing.

　　篇2

　　Recently, our efforts to protect wild animals was questioned by the public, because the news is keep reporting that more and more wild animals was killed by human beings, especially the very precious one. Innocent animals was dead for their meat, fur and tooth, it was just used to fill up human beings' desire. In my point of view, the wild animals were protected effectively still has a long way to go.

　　最近，我們保護野生動物的努力被公眾質疑著，因為總有新聞報道說野生動物被人類殺害，特別是珍惜野生動物。無辜的動物為它們身上的肉，皮毛，牙齒而亡，而這只是用來滿足人類的慾望而已。在我看來，要有效地保護野生動物，還任重道遠。

　　Firstly, people should try harder to make a better place for animals. The land where the wild animals live was deprived by human being. For hundreds years, people cut the trees to make land for their living and farming, wild animals' homeland was took, they have no choice but run away. What is more, human beings break the food link in nature; wild animals can not find enough food to keep alive. There is no doubt that the destruction of nature has become a big problem to kill wild animal, for instance, a polar bear was starved to death because of the greenhouse effect, the ice was melt away, the seadog and fish that polar bear like to eat are far away from them. For those reasons, people should protect the environment first if they want to protect wild animals effectively.

　　第一，人們應當更努力地為動物創造一個更好的環境。野生動物以前住的地方被人類剝奪去了。幾百年來，人們砍伐樹木，為他們住的地方和種植土地騰出地方。野生動物的家園被佔領了，它們除了逃跑別無他擇。再者，人們破壞了大自然的食物鏈，野生動物找不到充足的食物生存下去。毫無疑問，自然環境的破壞成為害死野生動物的大問題。例如，北極熊因為溫室效應而餓死，冰融化了，北極熊愛吃的海狗和魚離它們更遠了。因為這些原因，人們要有效保護野生動物得先從保護大自然開始。

　　Second, no buying, no killing. Some rich people like to wear fur coat, they treat it as a status symbol, especially for rich woman, they think animal fur is beautiful and warm, they will never consider that the fur they wear for years is the skin that animal wear for their whole life, and they knew how bloody when people took the fur from animal but they choose to ignore it. If people do not buy the fur and tooth, lots of wild animals will be survived.

　　第二，沒有買賣就沒有殺害。一些有錢人喜歡穿毛皮大衣，他們把這當做身份地位的象徵。特別是有錢的女人，她們認為動物皮毛很漂亮很暖和。她們從不會考慮她們穿幾年的毛皮大衣是動物穿一生的，她們也知道剝取皮毛有多血腥，但她們選擇無視。如果人們不買皮毛和牙齒，許多野生動物將得以倖存。

　　In sum, wild animals are our friends, we should give back and protect their homeland, and stop buying their body part, or our future generations will see them in zoo and museum.

　　總之，野生動物是我們的朋友，我們應當歸還和保護它們的家園，還有不要買它們的身體，不然我們的後代只能在動物園和博物館看到它們。

　　篇3

　　Some people think that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important that saving land for endangered animals.

　　Do you agree or disagree with this point of view? Why or why not?

　　Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

　　In the past, there have been many endangered animals. Now they are extinct. Does it matter? Has our environment been affected by their absence? Has the quality of our own life been changed? The answer to these questions is “Yes.”

　　Yes. It does matter if we destroy an endangered species habitat to develop more farmland, housing or industrial parks. There is a delicate balance of nature. If one small part is removed, it will effect all the other parts.

　　For example, if certain trees are cut down, bats will have no place to roost. If they cannot roost, they cannot breed. If there are no bats, there will be no animal, or bird to eat certain insects that plague our crops.

　　Yes. Our environment has been affected by the absence of certain animals. Certain flowers are pollinated by butterflies, which migrate from Canada to Mexico.

　　Some of the breeding grounds of these butterflies were destroyed. Now these flowers are disappearing from certain areas. We will no longer be able to enjoy their beauty.

　　Yes. The quality of our life has been changed America used to be covered with giant trees. Now we have to visit them in one small park.

　　Rain forests around the world are being cut down to make room for humans. We will never be able to see or study this fragile ecosystem.

　　I would encourage us humans to look for other alternatives for our farmlands, housing, and industries. We have alternatives; the animals do not.