貧富差距高考滿分英語作文範文
貧富差距這是一直都有的事情,我們國家也會有這樣的事情,怎麼寫好一篇關於貧富差距的英語作文呢?下面是小編給大家整理的貧富差距高考英語作文,供你參考!
貧富差距高考滿分範文篇一
貧富差距***Gap between the Rich and the Poor***
now there is a widespread concern***廣泛關注*** in china over the widening gap between the rich and the poor. we are surprised to learn that a pop singer can make over a hundred thousand yuan for one performance overnight, while it may take an average farmer his lifetime to earn that much.
the cause lies in three aspects. first, the gap is the result of the economic reform***經濟體制改革***. some seize the opportunities and become millionaires by working hard and meanwhile the slow development in agriculture hinders***阻礙*** the farmers from raising their living standards and the closedown of many state-owned***國營*** enterprises renders the jobless poverty-stricken. second, the current distributing***分配***of income is not scientific and reasonable, thus widening the income difference.third, while most make money honestly, there are some dishonest***不誠實*** businessmen and government officials who have accumulated large fortunes by illegal***違法的***ways. to narrow the gap, the government should take effective actions to help the poor, and meanwhile strictly enforce***嚴格實施*** laws to eliminate corruption***腐敗*** in government. on the other hand, reform on income distribution should be carried out and strict income taxation***稅*** should be made more workable and effective to narrow people's income gap. and finally, the traditional "law of value" and "principle ***原則***of more pay for more work" should have their final say.
貧富差距高考滿分範文篇二
While china continue to amaze the outside world with its stories of rapid economic growth,the country's Gini Co-efficient-a standard measure of income inequality has exceed the 0.40 threshold viewed as danger level.Although china has lifted hundreds of millions of people out of absolute poverty during the period of reform and opening,has transformed from planning economy system to marked-oriented system,the gap between the rich and poor remains in rural-urban income as well as in every social classes are widening that will confine the long-term development of national economy as whole.
The per capita disposable income of city dwellers released in 2003 was 8,472 yuan ***US$1,024***,compared with 2,622 yuan ***US$317*** of farmers that account for 80% of the national population. approx. 25% of chinese population is in the upper middle class to rich. But the larger segment-about 75% is in the low middle class to poor.Even though the past year of 2004 appears a good one for the country's some 800 million farmers thanks to a substantial recovery in grain price and cuting tax,the task to uplift the farmer income,to narrow the disparity and inequality which will affect society stabilization in rural-urban development level is arduous. to achieve a coordinated development between urban and rural areas and to resolve issues concerning agriculture, farmers and rural areas,Wen called for reforms to increase assistance and protection for agriculture, to speed up urbanization, to let cities play a bigger role in promoting the development of rural areas and to coordinate the development of urban and rural areas, by unifying the management of issues like labor, family, compulsory education, and taxation.
貧富差距高考滿分範文篇三
調查顯示中國貧富差距正急劇拉大***Survey: Gap Between China's Rich, Poor Widening Sharply***
Incomes have risen substantially since the late 1990s for urban residents in China, a country rapidly growing into an international center of manufacturing, a Gallup survey released Monday found.
The development has widened the divide between the haves and have-nots in China.
The Gallup project found that urban incomes have increased by almost 75% between 1997 and now - to an annual total equivalent to almost $3,000 - but that amount buys much more in the Chinese economy than it would in the U.S.
Rural incomes have increased only modestly during that time.
"There are job opportunities in the cities and that's where people are moving, that's where manufacturing for export is centered - China is the factory of the world," said Richard Burkholder, director of international polling for Gallup. "The gap between rich and poor has widened dramatically."
While those who move from the countryside to China's cities find their earning potential increase sharply, their satisfaction with living in the city hasn't kept pace with the satisfaction of those who live in rural areas, the poll found.
Residents of rural and urban communities in China were about equally likely to say they were satisfied with their own community as a place to live a decade ago. But now, 65% of those in rural areas say they are satisfied with their own communities, compared with 52% in urban areas.
The mass migration of rural residents to Chinese cities has placed huge pressure on cities to provide social services, say those who closely watch China's development.
The Gallup polling found that China's increased economic earning has been accompanied by dramatic changes in the everyday lives of many Chinese. The latest survey indicates color televisions ***in 82% of homes*** and landline phones ***in 63% of homes*** have become a normal part of most Chinese households. Half of the nation's households ***48%*** have at least one mobile phone.
The Chinese were more likely to express satisfaction than dissatisfaction with their lives generally - 63% to 37%. There was no significant difference between levels of general life satisfaction expressed by the urban Chinese and the rural Chinese.
For the last 25 years, China's economy has been undergoing a rapid transition, the result of a move toward a mix of free and state-owned enterprise.
The growing income disparity in China is causing friction between rich and poor, said Richard W. Bush, director of the Center for Northeast Asian Policy Studies at the Brookings Institution.
"People from poor rural areas are migrating to richer urban areas," Bush said. "Poor migrants are providing the cheap labor for products produced in the East Coast factories."
The differences between rich and poor inevitably cause tensions, said Drew Thompson , a China specialist at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.
"Anytime you have wealth disparities, you have social unrest," Thompson said.
"These events you hear about are sparked by a traffic accident or a perceived injustice by one group to another. There have been reports of civil unrest that relate to layoffs. Another source of friction is people being moved from their farms or homes."
Thompson added, "The growing gap highlights the unfortunate situation of a few who don't have good options."
Gallup has conducted its China survey since 1994, repeating it in 1997, 1999 and 2004, for the poll released Monday.
The poll of in-home, face-to-face interviews with 3,597 adults was conducted in June, July and November and has a margin of error of plus or minus 2 percentage points.
調查顯示中國貧富差距正急劇拉大
週一公佈的蓋洛普調查結果顯示,在迅速發展並日漸成為全球製造業中心的中國,城市居民的收入水平較九十年代末已有了顯著上升。
與此同時,中國富裕階層和低收入階層的收入差距也在加大。
蓋洛普調查發現,自1997年到現在,城市居民的收入平均增長了將近75%,目前人均年收入相當於3,000美元。值得指出的是,按絕對價格計算,中國的物價水平比美國要低得多。
不過同一時期,中國農村人口的收入增長水平卻非常有限。
蓋洛普國際調查事務部主任博克霍德***Richard Burkholder***說,城市地區有相當多的工作機會,而且,人們可以流動;同時,城市也是出口產品的製造中心,而中國正在成為世界工廠。他還說,中國富人和窮人的差距正在急劇拉大。
調查發現,雖然從農村進城務工的農民收入增加的潛力很大,但他們對生活的滿意度卻不及在農村居住的人。
十年前,中國城市居民和農村居民對他們各自生活環境的滿意度可能基本相當。但現在,有65%的農村居民表示,他們對自己生活的環境感到滿意,而城市居民中這個比例只有52%。
一些關注中國社會發展的人士指出,農村人口大量湧入城市,給城市的社會服務體系帶來了巨大壓力。
蓋洛普調查發現,中國人經濟收入的增加給許多人的日常生活帶來了巨大變化。最新調查顯示,彩電和固定電話已經成為大多數中國家庭不可或缺的東西,其中彩電的擁有率是82%,固定電話擁有率是63%。有接近半數***48%***的中國家庭至少擁有一部手機。
中國人對生活可能感到滿意的人比可能感到不滿意的人更多,這兩個比例分別是63%和37%。城市居民和農村居民總體的生活滿意度水平沒有明顯差距。
過去25年來,中國經濟經歷了迅速轉變,已從國有企業一統天下過渡到個體和民營企業與國有企業並存的局面。
布魯金斯學會***Brookings Institution***東北亞政策研究中心主任布什***Richard W. Bush***說,不斷拉大的收入差距在富有階層和低收入階層之間引起了摩擦。
他說,農村貧困地區的人口來到比較富裕的城市,他們為中國東部沿海地區的工廠提供了廉價勞動力。
戰略與國際問題研究中心***Center for Strategic and International Studies***的中國問題專家湯普遜***Drew Thompson***說,貧富之間的差距不可避免地會引發衝突。
只要存在財富差距,就會存在社會動盪的隱患。
比如在中國,駕車撞到行人會被視為一個階層對另一個階層的歧視,還有很多有關下崗引發民事糾紛的報導,還有一些人被迫放棄耕種的土地或住房被強行拆遷等等,這也是衝突的來源之一。
湯普遜補充說,不斷拉大的差距凸顯了一些人的貧困狀況,他們沒有更多的選擇。
蓋洛普最早是從1994年開始在中國開展調查的,後來在1997年和1999年又搞過兩次,最近一次是在剛剛過去的2004年,週一公佈的正是這次調查的結果。
這次調查對3,597名成年人進行了入戶調查,時間是在6月、7月和11月份,調查結果的誤差率為正負2%。