中國經濟相關的英語作文

　　我們即使是在英語寫作中，我們也會遇到關於中國經濟這型別的題目。下面是小編給大家整理的中國經濟的英語寫作範文，供大家參閱!

　　篇1

　　中國經濟發展

　　當今社會，伴隨著科技快速發展，我國經濟形勢蒸蒸日上。緊跟我國建設有中國特色社會主義的步伐，在黨中央的領導下，我國經濟建設的各方各面都取得了巨大成就。

　　我們完成了諸多造福百姓的巨大工程，例如西部大開發，南水北調等等。在居民的日常生活中，用水用電都更加方便快捷，出行選擇也多種多樣，極大提高了人民的生活質量。每一個孩子都有書讀有學上，學校硬體設施更加優越，對貧困學生的資助也愈趨完善，他們再也不用為學費發愁。不論生活在城市還是農村的老人都享有養老保險，再加上改革的社會保障制度，使他們都能安享晚年。

　　和平與發展已成為當今世界的主題，我國的國際地位不斷提高，對世界經濟發展產生巨大影響。加入世界貿易組織，我國的經濟政策牽動著世界的一呼一吸。成功舉辦奧運會和世博會，讓世界為中國經濟喝彩。

　　總之，中國經濟飛速發展，已經取得了輝煌成就。在我們的不懈努力下，中國經濟的明天一定更加美好。

　　Chinese economic development

　　Nowadays, with the fast development of technology, we can see that our economics developed very quickly. We have made big economic achievements in many aspects under the lead of our party.

　　There are countless programs making benefits for common people, such as large-scale development of the western region and South-to-North Water Diversion Project. We have easier access to water and electric power in daily life, and we have more choices when traveling. Every child can go to school and get an education in better school facilities. They don’t need to worry about their tuition fees with proper assistance. Old people have assurances no matter where he lives, and they can enjoy their life with the reformed social safety net.

　　Peace and development have become the theme of world. Our country’s international status keeps on improving, and we make great influences on the world economy. Joining in the WTO, our economic policies control the breath of world. Successfully holding the Olympic games and the world EXPO make the world give us more attention and respect.

　　In a word, Chinese economic develops at an amazing speed and has made encouraging breakthroughs. I believe that the tomorrow of our economy will be brighter as long as we try our best effort.

　　篇2

　　中國經濟發展需要良好環境

　　在上世紀90年代中期以前，只有專家才意識到在中國不斷惡化的環境問題與經濟發展之間的關係。而政府部門並沒有充分關注經濟發展所帶來的生態問題。社會大眾亦沒有察覺到生態環境是生產力的一個根本因素。直到1998年，長江流域突發洪災，政府高層官員才強烈意識到生態保護的重要性。因此，政府出臺環境保護相關政策，例如退耕還林還草。然而，生態惡化的程度遠遠高於這次長江洪災。

　　高速發展的中國經濟正面臨著“新經濟結構危機”，即嚴重缺乏相關於生產力的生態資源及必要因素。以出口為例，中國製造的商品在國際市場價格低廉，然而最大程度上來說，低廉的價格是以犧牲環境為代價的。在當今的生態環境下，進一步的經濟增長必須以大規模的“製造”必要因素為方向來保護生態環境。這就意味著我們必須彌補過去幾十年對環境造成的巨大損失以及消除因過度開發而導致的生態泡沫。

　　從科技上來說，嚴重的生態問題源於三個方面：資源消耗快速增長;資源利用效率低下;資源迴圈率底。

　　關於資源消耗，中國的消耗增長率可謂驚人。例如，國家鋼材消耗在1983年為3000萬噸，到2003年飆升到2億5000萬噸，20年內增長8倍，佔世界總消耗量的40%。水泥消耗大約為8000噸，1983年後也增長8倍，佔世界總消耗量的50%。能源消耗超過日本，僅次於美國。未來，中國工業結構任然保持以重工業和化工業為主，高能耗高汙染工業任佔據統治地位。

　　因此，中國必須大力提高提高資源利用率，加大資源迴圈，加強廢品的回收利用，來實現經濟快速發展，同時不增加甚至減少原始資源的消耗，不增加甚至減少汙染排放，不破壞甚至保護自然環境。這些就是迴圈經濟的技術性特徵。

　　毫無疑問發展迴圈經濟是一項基本的方法，來解決快速的經濟增長和不斷惡化的環境之間的矛盾。它也是唯一合理的方法來避免在經濟發展中的生態泡沫和新經濟結構危機。經濟發展需要良好的環境，經濟增長與環境優化並存才是人類文明進步的標誌。

　　No Growth Without Fit Environment

　　Prior to the mid-1990s, only specialists in China were aware of the relationship between the deteriorating environment and economic growth. Government departments failed to pay enough attention to the ecological issue brought about by economic development. The public also had no sense of seeing the ecological environment as an essential factor of production. Only in 1998 when flood disasters occurred in the Yangtze River Valley, did top government officials have a stronger sense of the

　　need for ecological protection. Thereafter, policies concerning environmental protection were formulated, such as restoring cultivated land to forests and grassland. However, the degree of the ecological deterioration is far beyond that of the Yangtze River flood.

　　The rapid growth of the Chinese economy is facing a “new structural crisis” that is highly short of ecological resources and essential factors for production. Taking exports for example, the price of Chinese-made commodities is very low in international markets, but the low price, to a great extent, is at the cost of sacrificing the environment. Under the current ecological situation, further economic growth must be oriented toward large-scale “production” of essential factors to protect the ecological environment. This means that we must make up for the huge damage caused to the environment in the past several decades, and eliminate economic bubbles caused by its overuse.

　　In regard to technology, the serious ecological problem stems from three aspects: The fast growth of resources consumption; low efficiency of resources utilization; and low rate of resource recycle.

　　In regard to resource consumption, China’s growth rate of consumption is surprising. For example, the country’s steel consumption in 1983 was 30 million tons, but soared to 250 million tons in 2003, up eight-fold in 20 years, or accounting for 40 percent of the world’s total

　　consumption volume. The cement consumption is about 800 million tons, a rise of eight-fold over 1983, or making up 50 percent of the world’s total. Power consumption has exceeded Japan, ranking second in the world to the United States. The future sees China’s industrial structure remaining in a stage with heavy and chemical industries as the mainstay, and high energy consuming and high polluting industries continuing to dominate.

　　Therefore, China must energetically raise its resource utilization rate, improve the recycling of resources, stress reprocessing and use of waste products, so as to realize rapid growth of its economy while not increasing or even reducing the consumption of primitive resources, not increasing or even reducing pollutant discharge and not damaging or even restoring the environment. These are the technical features of a cycle economy.

　　No doubt developing a cycle economy is a fundamental way to solve the contradiction between rapid economic growth and the increasingly deteriorated environment. It is the only logical way to eliminate the ecological bubbles and new structural crisis in the economic growth. Economic growth needs fit environment. Only the coexistence of rapid economic growth and continuing upgrading environment is the symbol of progress of human civilization.

　　篇3

　　經濟發展與環境保護

　　Which should receive priority in china ，economic growth or environmental protection?

　　正方一辯：從人類發展的終極目標看，我們要徹底地解決環境問題，必須要標本

　　兼治。要治本，必須優先發展經濟，從根本上優化經濟結構堵住產生環境問題的源頭，要治標，同樣要優先發展經濟，為解決眼前的環境問題提供技術、資金等支援，只有這樣，才能為人類生存和發展提供環境保障。

　　From the ultimate goal of human development, we need to address both the symptoms and root causes to solve the environmental problems thoroughly. To effect a permanent cure, we must give first priority to the development of economy, and optimize the economic structure fundamentally to block the source of the environment problems;To take temporary solution，we also should give priority to the development of economy, so that we have the

　　technology, capital and other supports for solving the environmental problems. Only in this way can environment protection be provided for human survival and development.

　　反方一辯：經濟發展是指社會能夠提供豐裕的商品來改善人類的物質生活,環境

　　保護則是採取一定的政策措施來保護生態平衡。經濟要發展意味著企業需要更多的廠房與原材料來保障商品的供應——那便存在一個問題：自然分給人類的土地與原材料是有限,經濟優先發展就一定會侵佔原本不屬於人類的自然資源。

　　The economic development refers to society can provide abundant commodity to improve human material life; environmental protection is to take certain policy measures to protect the ecological balance. economic development means that companies need more workshop and raw materials to ensure the supply of goods——then there is a problem, that is nature land and raw materials to human is limited, economic priority development will occupy nature resources which originally do not belong to the human.

　　二辯盤問 Two debate questioned

　　反方二辯：請問對方二辯，經濟是一時之事，環境是萬代之事，哪個重要?經濟

　　發展慢了，人們還可以吃到飯，環境沒了，還能生存嗎?

　　My fellow debaters ，please allow me to ask. The economy is the temporary matter, but the environment is of the ten thousand generation, which one is more important? When Economic develops slowly, people can also eat rice; how can we still survive if there is no environment.

　　正方二辯：不好意思對方辯友，恐怕我們今天討論的重點是優先權。並不是說經

　　濟優先就不搞環保了，只是環保處於較次的位置，跟中國現狀一樣，政策雖然說要重視環保，但一般縣區還是經濟發展優先的，也就有資本的大城市才比較重視搞環保，相信大家心知肚明

　　Sorry, I'm afraid the key points we debate today are the right of priority. Economy development first does not mean totally ignore the environmental

　　protection, the environmental protection is just in the inferior position .Just like the present China, although the policy attach great importance to environmental protection, economic development receive priority in the general counties, there is only capital cities would likely take it seriously to environmental protection, everybody know it in our own heart.

　　反方二辯：請問正方三辯，如果發展經濟優先的話，很可能造成環境成本大於經濟效益的情況，這樣的經濟是發展還是倒退?

　　Excuse me, my fellow debaters. If economic development receives priority then it is likely to cause the environmental costs to be larger than the economic efficiency, such economy develops or backs up?

　　正方三辯：這種情況確實有存在，但並不是每時每刻都存在。各個行業情況不同，

　　我們不能以偏概全。但按你的意思，這種情況下經濟效益是負的，那我們改行環境保護優先，就能轉虧為盈?我不這麼覺得。

　　This kind of situation is there truly, but not every moment. The situation in each industry is different; we cannot draw conclusions from one part. But according to your point, in this case the economic benefit is negative, then if we changed environment first, we can turn it into profit? I don't think so.

　　正方二辯： 我們知道環境的保護是預防為主，防治結合，而預防和治理都要依

　　靠技術的發展，那請問對方二辯，如果沒有強有力的經濟基礎支援科學技術發展，那麼以科技為支撐的環保從何談起呢?

　　We know that the protection of the environment is mainly prevention, and we should combine prevention with treatment, and the prevention and control depends on the development of technology, then my fellow debaters, if there is no strong economic basis for science and technology

　　development, then don’t mention the environmental protection supported by the science and technology.

　　反方二辯：你的問題未免抽象了點。科技發展無止盡，經濟發展也沒盡頭，什麼時候算得上是“強有力”呢?但是環境保護是迫在眉睫，耽誤不起。

　　Your question is a little abstract. Science and technology develops endlessly, so dose economic development, when will it be considered as “strong"? But environmental protection is imminent, which can't afford to delay.

　　正方二辯：請問反方三辯，經濟發展是讓人們享受到豐富的生活內容，包括衣食住行娛樂，這難道不是現在社會上人們的普遍願望嗎?

　　Excuse me, my fellow debaters. The responsibility of economic development is to let people enjoy a rich life, including the basic necessities and entertainment, isn't it now the people's universal desire?

　　反方三辯：人們喜歡的期望的不一定都是好的。我相信，人們更傾向於在一個既

　　能享受到生活樂趣，同時又是一個健康和諧自然的環境中生存。

　　People`s expectation is not necessarily that good. I believe that people

　　tend to live in a life of happiness, and at the same time, survive in a healthy and harmonious natural environment

　　自由辯論

　　正方一辯：請問對方辯友，原始社會的人類祖先們環境保護工作做得可謂好了吧，

　　而他們

　　經濟發展很落後，所所以才一直過著鑽木取火、茹毛飲血的生活，按你們的

　　意思我們應該回歸這種生活嗎?

　　Excuse me, my fellow friends .In the primitive society, human ancestor`s

　　environmental protection work is good, but to them Economic development is very backward, so it has been living a life of the earliest people, should

　　we return to this kind of life according to your meaning?

　　反方一辯：人類祖先確實需要發展經濟，但若是在這個過程中砍完了森林，汙染 了河流，使衣食都不再有保障，恐怕也無法發展下去了。我想問的是，核電站是

　　經濟發展的產物，但眾所周知，幾次核電站的洩漏帶來了環境的極度惡化，請問你怎麼看?

　　Human ancestors do need to develop the economy, but if cut out the

　　forests, pollute the river, making Food and clothing are no longer guaranteed in this process, I’m afraid it cannot develop any longer. What I

　　want to ask is, nuclear power station is the outcome of the economic

　　development, but it is well known that a few times nuclear power leakage

　　has brought the environment extremely worsened, what do you think of it?

　　正方二辯：首先，我方並沒有承諾經濟發展就一定會破壞到環境;其次，對方所

　　說的情況只是鳳毛麟角;第三，核電站洩漏是科技不力，而經濟是科學研究

　　的基礎。

　　First, we have never pledge that the economic development certainly will destroy

　　the environment; second, the situation you said is only rare; third, nuclear

　　power station leakage because the technology is not strong. But economy is the

　　foundation of scientific research.

　　反方二辯：但是核電站可以再建，那些汙染了的土地和地下水怎麼辦?沒有了這

　　些，我們的生活怎麼辦?你願意生活在核電站附近，還是一片山清水秀之

　　間?

　　But the nuclear power station may be reconstructed, how about these polluted land and the underground water? Without land and water, how

　　does our life manage? Would you like to live nearby the nuclear power

　　station, or between pieces of beautiful sceneries?

　　正方三辯：但是對方辯友請注意，核電站的建造，正是為了千千萬萬人類的生活

　　用電得到滿足。有了電，我們的機器可以運作，生產可以興起，環境總會有

　　辦法彌補，我也想問，你願意生活在兩小時停一次電的地方還是用電無憂之

　　處?

　　Please note that the construction of nuclear power stations is precisely to satisfy

　　millions of people's living power. With the electricity, our machine can be

　　operated, the production can rise, and there must be any way to make up for the environment. I also want to ask, are you willing to live in a place two hours stop a electricity or a place with abundant power.

　　反方三辯：你的意思是破壞了環境然後再去彌補。為什麼要先汙染後治理?為什

　　麼要兜這麼大一個圈子呢?而且我國的經濟建設里程已經證明，先汙染後治理是錯的，行不通的。

　　You mean to make up for the environment after destroying it. Why

　　management after pollution? Why to pocket so big a circle? And the

　　economic construction of our country has already proved that treatment after pollution is wrong, it won't work.

　　正方四辯：我不得不說我方真冤枉。是你給的前提，說核電站洩漏了，嚴重汙染

　　了環境，而我方堅信是可以挽救的。而且事實上，包括核電站在內的很多工業廠子，都種有青草綠樹，他們在搞經濟的同時，並沒有放棄環境的保護。 I can not but say that we are really undeserved. It is you who give the premise, said that the nuclear power station leakage has polluted the environment seriously, but we believed that is can be saved. And in fact, including nuclear power stations, many industrial factories, plant all kinds of green grass and trees, while they practice the economy, they do not give up the protection of the environment.

　　反方四辯：但是僅僅不放棄就可以嗎?再怎麼注意也無法保證無汙染，這樣日積

　　月累下來，依然會是一片慘狀。必須把環境保護放在第一位，每個工廠都嚴抓，才能從根本上阻止環境的惡化。

　　But only does not give up possible? However do we pay attention to the

　　environment, we cannot guarantee there will be no pollution. As time goes on, it will still be a miserable situation. So we must place the environmental protection in the first place, each factory should be managed strictly, only in this way, can we prevent the environment from worsening

　　fundamentally.

　　正方三辯：對方辯友請從事實出發，經濟發展必然會付出代價，我們已經在努力

　　使代價降到最低。

　　Opposite party debates , please to start from the fact, the economic development will definitely pay the price, we have been trying to make the price to a minimum.

　　反方三辯：降低應該有個標準吧，這不是你我能定的，是自然環境定的，等到他

　　揭示這個標準時，只怕為時已晚了。

　　Reduces should have a standard, which is not you or me can decide, it is the natural environment, when he reveals this standard, I’m afraid it is too late.

　　四辯總結

　　正方四辯：首先，我是一個支援環保的人，擁有一個健康的生態環境是可持續發

　　展得以進行的前提。但是，如果一味的保護環境，而忽視經濟發展，那麼對於經濟的發展不利，對於人們生活水平的提高也同樣不利。同時，我也必須強調，經濟發展絕對不是破壞環境，那樣的發展，也是違背自然規律的。在發展經濟的同時，我們要兼顧治理環境，才是當今可持續發展經濟的理念。 First, I am a supporter of environmental protection. Having a healthy

　　ecological environment is the premise of the sustainable development. But, if we blindly protect the environment, and neglect the economic development, then it has not any good for both economical development and people living standard. At the same time, I must stress that the

　　economic development not necessarily destroy the environment, such development also violates the natural law. While develop economy, we must give dual attention to the environmental protection, this is the

　　concept of sustainable economic development.

　　反方四辯：過去的發展道路走的就是先汙染後治理的模式，結果呢，環境問題突

　　出，區域性地區已經到了威脅生存的程度：再者，先汙染後治理的模式不但成本高，而且治理效果也不理想，處於一種被動的境地。因此，必須從源頭開始防止汙染，也就是發展過程首先考慮對環境的影響，只有這樣，才能有望在將來解決環境問題。

　　The past development road is a management-after-pollution pattern, the result is the environment problems standing out, and some areas even reach the extent which threat survival; Furthermore,

　　management-after-pollution pattern not only costs higher, but also is

　　inefficient, sometimes in a passive position. Therefore, we must start to prevent pollution from the source, that is to consider the possible influence on the environment during the development process. Only in this way, can we except to solve environment problems in the future.

　　英語辯論——環境保護 VS 經濟發展***經濟發展正方*** Which should receive priority in China? Environmental protection or economic growth. 正 方 陳 詞 ： Good morning everyone! We are here now debating about whether environment protection or economy growth should take priority in China, we think it’s environment growth that should be chosen. I have three reasons to prove this point. First, as a developing country, the economy power is far

　　behind the developed counties, China have one fifth of the people in the world, but the income of per head is only in 109th among countries. So the urgent affair of China is developing our economy. Second, economy growth doesn’t

　　necessarily conflict with environment protection. We can develop our economy without environment pollution. Third, when our economy strength becomes strong, we can spend more money and energy on environment protection, till then it will be a win-win. In a word, considering the current situations, economy growth should take priority in China. 反方陳詞：We agree economic growth is needed. But think about the past decades, we followed the old model of “first pollution, last treatment”, however, how did it come out? The environment problems have become increasingly prominent, and some local regions’

　　environment has been polluted to a dangerous extent that poses a great threat to our existence. What’s more, the cost was too high and the effect was not up to much. By this means, it placed us in a completely passive position. At the same time the people started voicing new values: quality of life, urban

　　conservation and the environment. So, we must get to the bottom of the problem and learn from the past. That is, in the course of development, we should consider the effect of pollution and receive environment protection in first priority. Only in this way can we solve the environmental problems in the future reasonably. That’s all I want to say. 自由辯論 正方二辯：We all know that in many places of china like many poor countries, where the environment is pretty good, there are thousands people lack of money for the food the need to live. Then, opponent debaters, do you think we still need to develop our

　　economies? 反方二辯：But opponent debaters can’t ignore the fact that most areas of China have solved the problem of food and clothing at present . Furthermore, the level of economic development in many cities in eastern China is very high .But the pollution is pretty serious accordingly. We have money, but being under the sub health condition. Does it make any sense, opponent debaters? 正方三辯：There do exist some eastern cities whose

　　economy is quite developed, but you forget that China has 130 million people. The eastern cities can’t stand for the whole China. We know that environment protection need high-technology, High-tech personnel, and science research. They all need a lot of money, and money is created by economy. I want to ask my fellow debater that can we protect our environment well without strong

　　economy strength. 反 方 三 辯 ： Environmental protection needs economy . But we can’t sacrifice the environment for the economic growth. If you drink

　　polluted water, eat the toxic food, can we have a high quality of life? Economic development must be on the premise of environmental protection. The policy of “returning farmland to forests and grass” slow down the speed of economic development to protect the environment. Doses it show that the environmental protection is more important? 正方：Opponent debaters have referred the returning farmland to forest policy. We admit our country has paid a lot of

　　money for the environment even sacrificing the profit .But we should still take economic construction as the central task. 反方： admit economic construction is our country’s principle task .But we have to insist We on sustainable

　　development while developing economy. We must attach great importance to the protection of the natural environment in the process of economic

　　development. 總結： 正方總結：Our opponent said , ” we can’t sacrifice the environment for the economic growth” .I think what they said can’t come true at present . It’s unavoidable to harm the environment while developing economy. 反方總結: Our opponent said ” the urgent affairs of china is developing our economy” .The goal we develop the economy today is to create a happy and comfortable life for people in the future . If the economic growth lead to the

　　pollution of the environment, can we live a better life? The excessive economic growth has caused the greenhouse effect, which lead to sea-level rises. As a result, thousands of coastal dweller has to face the fate of the migration. Moreover, the opponent also said,” when our economy strength become

　　strong, we can spend more money and energy on environment protection.” I want to question that when the animals and plants have died out, what the opponent debater protect with the money and energy. If the economic growth delays for two years, we can wait two years to develop it .But, if the

　　environmental protection delays two years, the species will be extinct, the

　　resources will exhaust. The urgency like this can’t wait. So our side advocates the environmental protection should receive priority in China. Thank you

---

看過中國經濟英語寫作範文的人還：